|
|
|
|
|
by fairity
1936 days ago
|
|
How share price reacts depends on a few factors: the price of the ATM offering, whether the offering is viewed as a sign of distress, and how the cash is used (or not used). If the ATM offering is priced at the current share price, and the company plans to just sit on the cash that it raises, the share price won't move much. Reason being: even though your shares are diluted, the company's total valuation increases (bc of the extra cash it just raised). Smaller piece of a larger pie == same value. However, AMC's offering was far from this ideal scenario. Instead of sitting on the cash raised, they're burning through all the cash they're raising just to keep the lights on. So, shareholders experienced dilution without any increase in company value. In a sane market, you'd expect share price to decrease by the dilution percentage. The fact that this hasn't happened (combined with the fact Cinemark's share price is still half of its pre-pandemic levels) should worry anyone with a long position. |
|
It’s in the same class as any tech ipo imho.
This gives some insight on where the company was at pre-pandemic:
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/amc-theatres-quarterl...
But in general, I think there’s good evidence that non-box office releases depress overall revenue (Mulan). Big studios want to be in theaters.
It’s not in the movie industry’s interest to let AMC fall, and AMC and all the pandemic hit industries are going to have to run a lean business to overcome the debt. In the above article AMC said they didn’t want to run ads (non-trailer) before the movie - well, now they will have to. There’s a lot they can do.
They seem like obvious plays to me.