Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by minsc__and__boo 1943 days ago
>Apple's incentives appear aligned with their customers

Not in China:

https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2018/03/apple-privacy...

2 comments

That is indeed a major problem, but it's still better than Facebook, whose incentives are never aligned with their users.
That's not due to Apple’s business model or their own choice. They were forced to hand over iCloud by Chinese regulators.
It is absolutely a choice made by Apple. Google said no to giving their user data to the Chinese government.
Google had the advantage that their service was separable from the physical devices using it.

I doubt you would be arguing that, if Apple bricked basically every iPhone in China, it would be evidence that their "incentives are aligned with their customers".

Hyperbole.

Being a separate device, as you said, means the phones would still work independent of Apple.

The Chinese government would block updates and sales, hencecustomers would blame them, not Apple, because Apple was incentivized with customers instead of the government moving forward.

Basically everyone with an iPhone uses an Apple ID. It is certainly not hyperbole that the devices usability would be very severely impacted without access to Apple's servers.
They would lose iCloud access. That's what the Chinese Government threatened them with.

It is not "bricking phones" as you said. As much as you don't like this fact, Apple had a choice and decided to put the Chinese government before it's users.

Like Google in China?