|
|
|
|
|
by Brakenshire
1941 days ago
|
|
I think the particular problem for devices based on ARM SoCs is they’re not on the mainline kernel, support for hardware and for upgrading software relies on a whole pile of hacks on top of an ancient kernel version, and that means that upgrading to a new Android version requires applying a pile of new hacks on top again, and can be very laborious to get a reasonable, stable result. So Fairphone used a chipset whose manufacturer quickly dropped support for upgrading beyond a certain Android version, and that made it difficult for Fairphone to support the upgrade themselves. Whereas if x86 systems have support on the mainline kernel, future kernel upgrades will be supported. |
|
Any reason there couldn't be a "canonical" ARM64 standard for SoC?