[arcturus17]

I was being facetious.

I agree there can be massive advantages to tools in the "lower-to-no-code" spectrum; even software developers benefit from the abstraction that frameworks and tooling provide. At a business level, many organizations that offer products and service in said spectrum have been successful at a massive scale: Wordpress, Salesforce, Tableau, Shopify, just off the top of my mind.

However my point about these applications creating a cascade of new jobs still stands. And I don't think more hand-crafted "high code" solutions are going anywhere either; for starters I don't think anyone making this sort of prediction understands the literal oceans handcrafted of code we swim in. Who's going to take care of that, and how long would it take to replace with "no-code"? Well over a century, would be my guess. Software hasn't eaten the world - it has devoured it.

Then there's the natural limitations of these tools. I had to look up HyperCard as I didn't know about it, and it was indeed an initial hit, but it seems like (a) it was limited (for example, Wikipedia mentions people were making "choose-your-own-adventure" games with it, but I know as a fact that some games made by solo devs in the late 80s where infinitely more intricate and deep) and (b) it didn't have that much lasting power. I wonder if the latter is yet another limitation of these tools - that they tend to quick obsolescence as tech trends move at breakneck speed.

[ebiester]

I will say, as much as I agree with you, even software organizations have problems that are well suited toward these low code platforms. After working through some of the quirks of retool, we have developers just adding things in the fraction of the time as they took with our first solution. I also saw another developer create an "excel++" solution with Airtable that allowed us to solve some problems that would have taken twice as long with twice as many people otherwise.

Now, this isn't every problem, but it's a very useful tool that will reduce the number of developers for some tasks. I think there is a world where a business has six or seven licenses for no-code solutions that reduce the head count by 10-15 FTEs (or redirects them)

[scroot]

> it didn't have that much lasting power. I wonder if the latter is yet another limitation of these tools - that they tend to quick obsolescence as tech trends move at breakneck speed.

Hypercard dying on the vine has much more to do with Apple's changing priorities than it does with Hypercard itself or what its users thought.