|
|
|
|
|
by Dracophoenix
1943 days ago
|
|
Funny you bring that up. There's on ongoing case[1] involving New Hampshire and Massachusetts about that exact scenario that's likely to end up debated by the Supreme Court. In essence, does a state have, absent special status like 503(c), the right to apply income tax on activities/services for rendered in different state? If so, that implies that any and every money-making activity done in any part of world may be taxable even if one person in Massachusetts pays for it. This would apply whether the activity is part of an individual sale[2], employment, or contract work as would it apply, mutatis mutantis, for every other state. [1]https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/new-hampshire-v-...
[2]Which is already subject to sales tax after the reversal of the Quill Corp vs. North Dakota decision in South Dakota vs. Wayfair |
|
ADDED: So I guess (although it's not super-clear) that it's a matter of being officially assigned to an office and maybe going in semi-regularly. Presumably if someone is 100% officially remote at a company with many offices, it wouldn't apply. https://andersen.com/pressroom/telecommuters-beware-of-state...