You're getting downvoted a lot, but these days I too place very little confidence in a story that cites anonymous sources, regardless of whatever supposed gravitas the publication is supposed to carry.
Honest question: where do you place the goalpost with regards to news on corporate malpractice?
If not from whistleblowers, which have a long track record of being persecuted extensively and subjected to very personal and very damaging retaliatory attacks if not for anonymity, then in your eyes what warrants questions?
If not from whistleblowers, which have a long track record of being persecuted extensively and subjected to very personal and very damaging retaliatory attacks if not for anonymity, then in your eyes what warrants questions?