|
|
|
|
|
by whimsicalism
1945 days ago
|
|
> non-white stakeholders (homeowners) aspire to the same kind of skin-in-the-game cooperation with their neighbors. What about the rampant housing discrimination in home-buying (without any enforcement) [0]? What about massive racial wealth disparates? I think it is pretty naïve to suggest that the current backlash against having "renters" has nothing to do with race. Not more naïve than suggesting it only has to do with race, but close. [0]: https://projects.newsday.com/long-island/real-estate-agents-... |
|
Or, we could take a shortcut and ask those very people what they think and what they would like.
Which is to say, let's find some non-white stakeholders (homeowners) with skin in the game in their neighborhoods and communities and ask them what they think.
I drive through some very nice, very well ordered, single family zoned nieghborhoods in Fremont - the owners of which are predominantly non-white. The same exists in many other bay area communities.
Are those people vehemently advocating for upzoning and loss of local control ? Do those people have a strong preference for owners over renters ?
Genuinely curious ...