|
|
|
|
|
by LeifCarrotson
1943 days ago
|
|
Copper is also 60% better in the thermal conductivity properties as well, which is another critical property. Power density in an electric motor is really based on how fast you can remove heat from the motor. I'm involved in sizing industrial servomotors, but even there you have 1s/10s/60s power ratings. I wonder if H3X can post higher power levels for takeoff, assuming it starts cold and the flight plan calls for throttling back after a certain altitude is reached. And even in the event of an immediate 150% power return to runway after a 150% takeoff, the motor might only have slightly degraded the winding insulation; it can almost certainly exceed its ratings once for long enough to get back to the ground. |
|
That being said, typically the effective thermal conductivity of the winding (perpendicular to the axis of current flow) is limited by the insulation (strand and/or turn) and the encapsulation/varnish. As a result, changing the thermal conductivity of the conductors themselves will have much less impact on the total thermal resistance (from winding hotspot to coolant) than changing the insulation and encapsulant thermal conductivities.
At these very high power densities, the thermal RC time constants inside the motor are very short (small motor = small thermal capacity, low thermal resistance by design). Therefore, even for a "short" 10 minute takeoff, most of the motor will have already hit thermal steady state. As such, the motor needs to be able to run at takeoff power continuously. There has been a lot of fun discussion elsewhere in this thread about how to tackle that aspect of the problem (given that takeoff power is typically 3x cruise power).
I will say that we are working on developing a high thermal conductivity (> 1 W/m-K) and high temperature (> 300 C) insulation system.