|
|
|
|
|
by nix23
1938 days ago
|
|
Again why then are they investigated, your story sound too easy and one-sided, if you dont have an argument, you just say "we can just speculate." Fact is: -Aung San Suu Kyi defended actively a genocide for not being one, while speaking in The Hague. -The civilian government was informed and partially included in the genocide. Both points are fact, and NOT speculations. |
|
The military does not take orders from civilian government, it’s the other way around. Civilian gov has no legal or de facto control over Tatmadaw, or border control, or home affairs (police, courts). There is no civilian legislative control over Rakhine operations. Tatmadaw just does whatever they wants.
And anyone who speaks against their actions is imprisoned. If AASK spoke against them they would have imprisoned her again, like they just did. The politics AASK is dealing with are complex.