Maybe she is actually a genocider reborn. Maybe she isn't.
What we know is that she doesn't really have any authority.
If she does something the military didn't like, whoops there's a coup.
If the military is likey or feels so so about it, then it's fine.
If the military wants her to do something, she probably has to.
The coup proves that.
Western people are out of touch. You cannot speak up or playing a martyr in these countries because they will actually kill you and your family and everyone involved.
To answer your question, we'll probably never know.
Apparently, you probably don't know either since your question implied that she had authority.
>Western people are out of touch. You cannot speak up or playing a martyr in these countries because they will actually kill you and your family and everyone involved.
Quite the opposite, you think that was different in Hitlers reich? Do you think peoples who denied concentration camps and had no authority (but knew about it) where innocent?
>If the military wants her to do something, she probably has to.
That's is and was the lamest excuse for every human being ever!
There are different factions in the military, one of which was the architect of Burma’s democratic transition, the other which opposes the transition (who current dictator/CIC is part of).
The military miscalculated, as they didn’t intend for ASSK or NLD to outsmart them in constitution of their own design. Military had expected to win enough seats with their proxy party + military appointed seats to prevent NLD choosing a president. But NLD won enough seats to choose president, and their chosen president gets to appoint commander-in -chief (military must confirm). Never before had a president appointed the CIC. The military saw this has a threat to their power. They do not want to be under any civilian control. And Min Aung Hlaing (current dictator) is also probably afraid of genocide charges if he is no longer in power.
The coup proves that she never really had any authority to begin with.