|
|
|
|
|
by Cullinet
1947 days ago
|
|
conceptually holding more cash than you can usefully spend reduces your cash value and doesn't have to happen with inflation I remember Buffets letter to shareholders apologising Berkshire Hathaway wasn't able to continue delivering the same historic returns because that trajectory would require them to own every publicly traded asset in the world after ten more years. even now you can potentially eliminate the major inflationary risks by holding property without debt and rely on policy consumer price regulation to hold basic necessities in check but I personally think that energy risks and not only exceptional weather events put that out of contention for sanity sake. In fact if energy infrastructure and general infrastructure development is increasingly critical for the future it makes little sense to have a cash savings incentive in the economy despite this is unfortunately not a explicit case for the generational savings deprecated in a way that I readily appreciate. edit to remove accidental negative from I personally [don't] think that energy risks.... |
|