Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by staticassertion 1952 days ago
I don't think that's the case at all, and I don't think that Armstrong would either.
1 comments

You're probably right that Armstrong would be too humble to say it, but increased engineering effort is the only conceivable mechanism for unreliable networks to produce more reliable systems. I can't even tell what you think is going on.
In his initial thesis on Erlang, and in any talk I've seen him give, or anything I've seen him write, he attributes reliability to the model, not to BEAM.