|
|
|
|
|
by as300
1951 days ago
|
|
I see quite a bit of disappointing talk that disregards the contents of the article, here. Namely, the author names one sort of bias that led 'Very Smart People' to give an outsized likelihood of Trump winning: >I remember thinking at the time that this particular opinion of his was over-confident, perhaps even a result of over-internalizing the heuristic that if a viewpoint seems clever and contrarian then it is likely to be correct. Doesn't this explain crypto-user's pro-Trump bias? Someone who uses crypto as a way to play on a prediction market is necessarily going to be contrarian, to some degree (remember we're being constantly bombarded by claims of how all crypto is "just speculation"). In the same way, believing Trump actually has a case for overturning the election results is a highly contrarian view. |
|
This was not solely, or even primarily, a crypto thing.