|
|
|
|
|
by extrapickles
1950 days ago
|
|
You can get electronic probes that measure the stock automatically so you don’t need precision blanks. The probe loads in the tool changer so it can be completely automated. Automatic tool setting makes it so operators don’t need to measure new tooling in tool holders, and tooling wear can be monitored automatically. I dabble in running a small machine-shop, and we are able to automate a good chunk of what people still do manually. The stock we use is cheap, straight from the mill stuff as we have the machine measure the stock with an electronic probe. The machines also have 20 pallets, so once the stock is loaded, the operator can leave the machine for 20x the cycle time of a part. The pallets don’t even have to be the same product, so we can queue up replacement of inventory with just the quantity that a customer ordered and offer a bunch of made-to-order parts with reasonable turnaround times. The machines also monitor spindle vibration so they can tell if a tool looses an insert, and the tool-setter is used to check if solid tooling is still intact. The only manual parts are taking raw materials off the suppliers truck, unloading finished parts (next on automation list), final assembly (working on automation for this), occasionally loading new tools as they wear/break and fulfillment. |
|
That's a key feature. For unattended operation, you must have good fault detection. This tends to be an overpriced extra cost option on machine tools.
There are a lot of things in industrial automation that cost more than they should. Motors with encoders, for example.