|
|
|
|
|
|
by chrisseaton
1947 days ago
|
|
|
You're allowed to use trademarks to factually describe what a product is. Your linked law suit is about something entirely different to what's being discussed in this thread - that's about describing restaurants as shut when they aren't. |
|
|
https://www.classlawgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/Grubhub-Cla...
You're not allowed to use trademarks to masquerade as the other party, especially if you're then trying to conduct business as if you were that other party.
Taking a step back: is there any trademark usage that you view as infringing?
Using an example from another side discussion: I hope we can agree that if you made a laptop and called it a Macbook Pro, Apple would sue the heck out of you, and they'd be in the right. Where we seem to disagree is whether it's infringement if you set up a storefront, name it "Apple Store", and exclusively sell products that you've purchased from an Apple-run Apple Store.