Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by tomnipotent 1949 days ago
The only place Citus is mentioned in the post is in the title of a chart. Might be worth updating to include this, would also clarify note #3:

"ClickHouse is still faster than the sharded Postgres setup at retrieving a single row, despite being column-oriented and using sparse indices. I'll describe how we optimized this query in a moment."

1 comments

Not A-F1V3, but also a Mux co-founder.

To be transparent, we included Citus in original versions of the post, but decided to take it out because it didn't feel like it was a fair representation of Citus™. As Adam mentioned, what we were using was heavily customized and based on a pretty outdated fork by the time we transitioned.

This should be clarified in the post, otherwise you lead the reader to believe you're representing stock Postgres performance instead of the performance of a forked Citus. This is important information for an informed reader.