Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by marshray 1951 days ago
He's arguing (to paraphrase) "Because we've already incurred such costs we should continue or even expand the policy which caused them."

Claiming that hazardous nuclear waste represents a fixed cost no matter how much you generate is simply absurd.

1 comments

Do you have any data that says the cost (ie. money or security) is materially increased from this point forward given the space to store is truly small.
No, because the US currently has no such long term storage facility in operation.