| Why are people willing to give traditional news media propaganda unfair advantage compared to public to game the algorithm? (This is part of the new bill) The entire thing will make Google a propaganda machine for news corp and other media giants as Google can neither rank them low nor remove them from search results and be forced to pay to sustain them. Why are people willing to protect ad ridden news industry when they hate big tech adware so much? What's the difference? Shouldn't you be against both? Have you seen how bad trackers on news site are? I would rather use Google than generic news site full of trackers from everywhere. Everyone wants to stick it to big tech but big media is suddenly good? Every newscorp owned site is a cess pool of nazi defender and propaganda. Any legislation which targets specific companies so blatantly isn't good. Anything which sets a precedent for paying for linking to someone isn't a good idea. Come up with better anti trust laws instead of whatever this is and target every big tech company. |
This is the same fight that Uber had to fight with taxi cartells. You need to fight, you need to fight hard, and most importantly you need the public on your side. I'm not sure if FB's move is the right one and will get public support, but at least it opens people's eyes to the consequences of this.