|
|
|
|
|
by alprc
1949 days ago
|
|
I don't have the exact size comparison between this approach vs PNG compression, but i guess the difference would be similar to the difference between DEFLATE vs brotli. I'm curious about what you just asked of me though, i will make the actual measurements, and will update this page with the results when i got time. |
|
I'm thinking about it the other way also, that is could your approach be used to reduce the size of DEMs encoded as PNGs. While I can see brotli being more efficient, by not using a image compression algorithm you perhaps lose out on exploiting the 2D nature of the data, as if I understood correctly when you're compressing the data you treat the tile as a 1D blob of binary data.