|
|
|
|
|
by thamer
1943 days ago
|
|
It really is terrible, and many enthusiasts don't seem to understand enough about Bitcoin to even realize it. For so many it's just a way to make a quick buck when Elon tweets about it. To put in in numbers, according to the Bitcoin Energy Consumption Index[1] (they link to other research that arrive at similar conclusions, if not worse): the total footprint is almost 37 million tons of CO2, a single transaction accounting for over 300 kg. A single transaction requires the same amount of energy as an average household over 22 days, or emits the same amount of CO2 as a 2020 Civic driving 1,000 miles. The comparison with the visa network is just as wild: a single bitcoin transaction takes more energy than 432,000 visa transactions. At this point it's highly irresponsible to continue using and supporting Bitcoin. [1] https://digiconomist.net/bitcoin-energy-consumption |
|
Does not make sense? Of course not because dividing the amount of electricity used to mine a block by the amount of transactions also doesn't make sense.