|
|
|
|
|
|
by bondarchuk
1950 days ago
|
|
|
>but they do not address the larger question of whether/why racists/sexists find his blog appealing. Whether or not that is something you can and should address is of course one of the main issues here. The NYT would like if you only quote, welcome, converse, engage with people who are 100% correct and approved in all their views. If you disagree with that then there is also not much to explain. Sometimes unpleasant people like to read good blogs, and sometimes unpleasant people say insightful things that you might want to incorporate in your blogpost. Such is life. |
|
|