Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by linklonk 1956 days ago
The theme I get from this post is that technology is becoming more and more frictionless at the expense of our agency.

And when we lose control of what we do next we lose track of where we want to get to.

"The feed" does not fully capture this idea. There are feeds that do not take away your control.

My hobby project is a "feed". But the contents of the feed is fully determined by what items you explicitly upvoted and downvoted.

When you upvote an item, you get stronger connected to other users who upvoted it. Their other upvoted items start ranking higher for you.

When you downvote something, your connection to others who upvoted it becomes weaker. So their future upvote have less weight.

This algorithm is transparent and predictable. This makes it possible to meaningfully interact with it. What you vote on has direct consequences for what you will see in the future. It makes you think about your future self. Where you want to be. When you consider to upvote something you need to answer the question: do you want to get more content from people who found this useful?

If this sounds interesting to you, give it a try at https://linklonk.com/register with invitation code "hn" (a temporary account is created, you don't need to give your email to try). It is very early days, I would appreciate any feedback.

1 comments

This sounds like an echo chamber
Yes, to address this I have an FAQ entry for it (https://linklonk.com/about): " Is it a filter bubble? On LinkLonk you pay attention to those who you chose to pay attention to. In a sense, LinkLonk is a filter bubble.

A filter bubble is a problem when a system chooses content to show to you without giving you clear control or an explanation of how it came up with these recommendations.

On LinkLonk the ranking mechanism is transparent and is easy to understand. LinkLonk does not try to guess what you would like. What you see is controlled by your explicit ratings. For example, when you see a recommendation from users, LinkLonk explains what links you have in common with these users. "

Also, I think "echo chamber" (compared to "filter bubble") is often used to describe a dynamic that emerges in groups - when members of a group reinforce who is in and who is out of the group. I think LinkLonk avoids this problem by not having the concept of a group. Every user decides for themselves who they want to hear from. There is no boundary to reinforce - no echo chamber walls to erect.

I don't know for sure whether it would become a harmful echo chamber or a useful tool that helps you find high signal-to-noise information. I'd like to give it a try to find out.