|
|
|
|
|
by shubble
5491 days ago
|
|
I've heard that unlike say steel, the majority of gold ever mined is still in circulation, and by circulation I mean locked vaults.
A few large organizations control the vast majority of it, and this is especially true since governments have not needed to hold gold for years.
The reason for the scarcity of gold, and it's value, is that this gold is not for sale.
One gold owning organization could make a great deal in other currencies by attacking the gold market, much as quantum fund used it's sterling holdings to attack the British currency with great success. Lots of people seem to think gold is 'safer' than paper currencies, while it seems the same. Am I missing something important here? |
|
Quite possible.
A few large organizations control the vast majority of it, and this is especially true since governments have not needed to hold gold for years
Say what? A few large organizations, who are not governments, hold the vast majority of the world's gold? Are we into conspiracy-theory talk here?
Lots of people seem to think gold is 'safer' than paper currencies, while it seems the same
"Safe" depends on what you mean. For instance, you could say "US dollars have a 99% chance of retaining at least 80% of their value in five years, and a 99.9% chance of retaining at least 10% of their value in five years. Gold has only a 80% chance of retaining at least 80% of its value in five years, but a much higher 99.999% chance of retaining at least 10% of its value in five years".
Gold gives you much more volatility in the short term, but acts as a hedge against the collapse of any particular currency.
I wouldn't buy it though. I'd buy land (with houses on it), which acts as a hedge and pays you income.