|
|
|
|
|
by lonesword
1953 days ago
|
|
> The problem here is not invention. The problem here is that aliabramovitz and company "like to stay away from those [theological] aspects as it can be off putting for people who don't subscribe to a certain philosophy or theology", in a subject matter where the original theology is a core part of it, and that too a theology that is not aliabramovitz's own theology in order to cater to people who dislike the theology of the original owners of the practice. And as an Indian who used to practice Yoga as a child (too boring for me now) I'd say that this is completely fine. If the theological aspect was indeed crucial for deriving value from the whole experience, people would eventually lose interest because they wouldn't be gaining anything from the aliabramovitz's venture right? Isn't it enough to see that a garden is beautiful without having to believe that there are fairies at the bottom of it too?[1] [1] Quote by Douglas Adams |
|
And this is the exact reason that these practices should not be divorced from their theological fundamentals in the way that White Abrahamics practice it.
And this is also why you as an Indian should not be happy to let the whole be stripped into parts and sold for money and commoditized down to an entertainment or sport that you are "bored" by.