Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by call_me_dana 1949 days ago
They actually do. But your definition of “fundamentally different” may be fundamentally different than mine.
1 comments

Your immune system learns how to recognize a foreign antigen. The fact that your muscle cells' ribosomes are temporarily instructed to produce said antigenic proteins is immaterial to the fundamental mechanism of immunity. The mRNA stays in the cytoplasm and is not carried into the cell nucleus; it has no opportunity to affect the genome. The onus is on you here to present peer-reviewed evidence to the contrary.
No, mine is the accepted view and has been for years. Being that you are bringing a completely new outlook to the vaccination process, the onus is on you to provide evidence.

Anyone else who’s reading this, take note of what they did here. Say that mRNA gene therapy is the same fundamentally as traditional vaccines which is absolutely not the case. Then attempting to make the person espousing the traditional view provide evidence of the accepted fact. Liars like this need to be called out. They are NOT the same.

I was extremely clear in my wording and explanation. Your attempt to misconstrue my comment and intention, as well as your ad hominem attack, suggests you were never arguing in good faith from the start.