[anon98356]

IANAL but the judgement seems to saying, you can't just use prepned an actualy allegation of fraud with "It is my opinion" to claim it is opinion.

My argument isn't that, it's to challenge the idea that calling something a scam can ONLY mean I'm accusing them of fraud.

>First, the defence of honest opinion. The Claimant submits that the defence of honest opinion cannot succeed in circumstances were the words used convey an allegation of fraud.

The foundation of this argument is to challenge the assumption the words actually convey an allegation of Fraud.

It would get pretty deep into the evolution of language/multiple meanings and slang and probably isn't worth fighting, but I still think it's a valid (or at least interesting) defense.