|
|
|
|
|
|
by reidrac
1961 days ago
|
|
|
A bit sad that they gave up on Mercurial, if they really think is better for their needs; although having used Subversion, Mercurial, Bazaar, git, ...; I kind of like when it is just git. Not because is better or I like it better, but switching between tools in this case was PITA because of the subtle differences of almost the same commands. > And the way that most people personally like using git is via GitHub. I don't get it. In which way? I use GH for pull requests, may be issues? There's a lot more of my git day to day than that. I don't think you really use git via GH. |
|
|