|
|
|
|
|
|
by bdowling
1960 days ago
|
|
|
In US law this idea is called defamation per se. [0] If a statement is defamation per se, then the court can skip analysis of whether the statement is defamatory. Defamation per se statements are divided among several categories, one of which is stating that the plaintiff is unfit to practice his or her profession. Accusing an attorney of being "a scam solicitor" falls into that category. [0] https://www.findlaw.com/injury/torts-and-personal-injuries/w... |
|
|