|
|
|
|
|
by cookiecaper
1960 days ago
|
|
Containers are not intended to be a security boundary -- functionality along those lines has been gradually backported as maintainers realized that nobody was going to care when they said "don't use these as a security boundary". There's a world of difference between the amalgamation of hacks that comprise cgroups and something like BSD jails, which are and afaik always have been intended to be a security boundary, which implements real first-class kernel isolation for jailed processes, not just another subtree under proc that provides some direction to the kernel around resource consumption/priority and relies on UID/GID hacks to control access. |
|