|
|
|
|
|
by rcstank
1959 days ago
|
|
Isn't decentralized planning essentially the current economy? If I have a skill to provide a service, I can start my own business in my town to make a living. I don't have to accept currency as payment. I can more or less accept payment via other goods such as food for my family. In smaller towns this is still not unheard of. My father in law is a mechanic and many people pay him with goods rather than currency (he still accepts cash, however). If a competitor opened up next to him, they'd both then compete, thus trigger your decentralized planning since they both have to innovate or come up with methods to gain customers. |
|
No it isn't, decentralized economic planning involves communal ownership not private (shareholder) ownership which allows communal management and prioritizing the needs of people and not the wants of those with most money/capital.
The current political-economy in most countries is Liberalism. ( https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Economic_liberalism )
> If I have a skill to provide a service, I can start my own business in my town to make a living.
If you have a skill then under decentralized economic planning you would provide it as needed and not start a business (own or otherwise)
> I can more or less accept payment via other goods such as food for my family. In smaller towns this is still not unheard of.
That would be barter, it is more common to accept non-currency IOUs when doing communal work / services rather than directly into goods/services.
> If a competitor opened up next to him, they'd both then compete, thus trigger your decentralized planning since they both have to innovate or come up with methods to gain customers.
In a decentralized planned economy if someone else wanted to work as a mechanic then they would cooperate rather than compete.