|
|
|
|
|
by jerrymiller
1958 days ago
|
|
Case in point still. The contradictions you make are astounding. What's more astounding is that you are not even noticing them. > Huge investment firms diversifying into crypto > this is an indictment of the cryptocurrency community's basic financial literacy I suggest that maybe it's you who lacks basic financial (and econ) literacy, not investment firms or the "cryptocurrency community" > You can't just call a speculative instrument a "store of value" because every who bought into it in the past two months has seen a positive return No, everyone who bought BTC at _any point in the past_ and didn't sell are seeing positive returns. This is the definition of a good store of value. You are conflating SoV properties with volatility. They are orthogonal. SoV is a long-term play. |
|
No, it isn't. Apart from the fact that countless people have lost their shirts to BTC (it's down 6% today! There are losers today!), an asset whose value rises in unchecked proportion to the real economy represents a fundamental liquidity risk: everybody is going to want to sell, but nobody is going to want to buy.
That is why cash is the canonical store of value: not only does it not change (much), but you can exchange it without undermining the value itself.