[dirtyid]

> they could appoint a tyrant during wartime to make quick decisions before returning power to the senate.

That's the entire point - the fact that many contemporary liberal societies can no longer use such tools is worth introspection. Many countries had quarantine act or equivalent emergency power structure designed for pandemics, but what good are they if current political climate make them infeasible. This overlooks the fact that harsh authoritarian responses have been in line with epidemic response playbooks drafted by the CDC. It was what was expected.

The myopia is thinking this is a choice between authoritarianism and liberalism, but between society where you can rely on leadership to do difficult things for the greater good versus one that cannot.

[smt88]

What is a historical example of a country with a mechanism for "temporary authoritarianism" where that mechanism was not abused to create permanent authoritarianism?