Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by SpicyLemonZest 1961 days ago
I understand your point, but the strategy you're describing is exactly what the author is frustrated by. Maryland doesn't have "stupid rules about who is allowed to get an appointment", and all doses which become available are quickly claimed - as a consequence, if she wants to claim a dose for her parents, she has to run around at odd hours checking with everyone who might have new availability. Until we have enough shots available for everyone who wants one, there's no way to make everyone happy.
2 comments

Her problem is a good problem to have. Mine is not.

That means people in Maryland are readily receiving the vaccine and between whoever has already been infected, those who are likely to survive infection with little consequence and the daily increase of people who are now vaccinated, the entire State of Maryland is becoming more resistant by the day which will do as much to mitigate risk to her parents as everything else.

A 95% effectiveness rate still means that every 5 out of a hundred vaccinated people will still be vulnerable to infection post-vaccination. Either one of her parents could be one of those 5.

Given we have now reached the point that society will refuse to open up properly until we have vaccinated tons of people, let’s get people vaccinated, lots of them and quickly.

As a Maryland resident, I certainly feel we have "stupid rules about who is allowed to get an appointment" at a statewide level AND we've got a bunch of providers interpreting those stupid rules in inconsistent and arbitrary ways.

My doctor's office has apparently received some vaccines but are only vaccinating people in Group 1A because they feel that's the most important. But the governor claims we've moved into Group 1C, and if I can snag an appointment with a different provider, I might be in luck.

It's roughshod but very reasonable.

The US is vaccinating fast.

There is a 'rough sequence' that people should be following.

Some gears in the system will be off, and some individuals will act poorly - but that's ok, it doesn't need to be perfect.

Speed of delivery probably takes preference over secondary quibbles about order of priority, as long as there roughly is one.

Take solace in the fact the US is way ahead of other nations, and thank God, because the amount of 'anti lockdown' populism in the US I feel has been considerably higher than in most other places and I don't think the population could handle any more lockdowns or more assertive measures without some very ugly populism in the streets.

> the amount of 'anti lockdown' populism in the US I feel has been considerably higher than in most other places

Herd immunity by July, one way or another.

I'm afraid that is the 'effective crowd sentiment' in the USA and frankly, that's a lot of dead people.

I feel that many areas will try to 'rush back to business' once most 65+ are vaccinated and just won't care much beyond that.

I read all sorts of blogs/comments around various news publications, trying to 'get a pulse' and it's a little disturbing to read a lot of comments from people who seem to think that 1-2% of US population 'written off' is just fine from their perspective.