Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by CharlesW 1958 days ago
Related:

"The User is Drunk" (2013) https://youtu.be/r2CbbBLVaPk

"The User is Drunk"-as-a-Service (2015): https://theuserisdrunk.com/
4 comments
BubuIIC 1958 days ago
I found the linked retrospective "The user has sobered up" quite an interesting read: https://medium.com/@richlitt/the-user-has-sobered-up-df0b411...
link
conradfr 1957 days ago
The first part is interesting but the section "Checking My Privilege" is really virtue signaling looking for a problem.
link
Yikes2 1958 days ago
most alcoholics have to drink for 20 years to get as sanctimonious as this guy does in six months.
link
brundolf 1958 days ago
By the same guy: https://theuserismymom.com/

Edit: Really bizarre that I'm getting downvoted. It's relevant and entertaining supplemental info. Chill out, people.

link
kristopolous 1958 days ago
Not having seen this before, I use the term "faucets and toilets" to mean the same thing.

It should always work, be boring, obvious to use, and ideally not even be considered technology.

If you ask people if they know how it actually works, they should be able to confidently say yes until it comes time to explain it.

It means it's so reliable, predicable and dependable that it's viewed almost as a law of nature. It becomes knowable without having to also be known

link
CharlesW 1958 days ago
> …I use the term "faucets and toilets" to mean the same thing. It should always work, be boring, obvious to use, and ideally not even be considered technology.

I like that, but I think that's something different than expressed by "the user is drink" or "the user is high".

Assuming I understand you correctly, "faucets and toilets" is a way of summarizing that UX design should favor popular convention when possible.

"The user is drunk/high" is a way of saying that, regardless of the novelty of a particular interaction (not all of which can be faucets/toilets), designers should assume that users will always be more-or-less impaired by the distractions of life.

link
kristopolous 1958 days ago
Nope. When was the last time you truly focussed on the operations such things?

If you focus on a toilet, at least in a conventional setting, there's either something wrong with it or that's your profession.

That's one point. If people have to pay attention, it's broken.

Such quibbles here are ultimately irrelevant, but your characterization is a misreading.

link
CharlesW 1957 days ago
> If people have to pay attention, it's broken.

Ah, now I get your point. I've never used or help design an app where no interactions require at least some attention, but I like it as a goal.

link
elicash 1957 days ago
I wish there was a theuserisblind.com that created videos for a fee of using your site with a screen reader
link