Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by lunixbochs 1955 days ago
This answer says the block is more efficient than manually managing NSAutoreleasePool objects: https://stackoverflow.com/a/12448176

This answer looks like a better overview of what the runtime is doing: https://stackoverflow.com/a/21010442

The @autoreleasepool block seems equivalent to this:

    ctx = _objc_autoreleasePoolPush()
    defer _objc_autoreleasePoolPop(ctx)
You could maybe provide sugar for it like this: https://play.golang.org/p/dljXN3BdEGr
2 comments

The implementation of your "sugar" can be shortened:

https://play.golang.org/p/8v4EL2B_c_t

Awesome, can you throw into an issue?
wow, thanks!
Keep in mind that the reason the `@autorelease` syntax is faster is primarily due to ARC optimizations (which don't apply here, since you're not using ARC).

Calling the `_objc_autoreleasePoolXX` functions are still likely to be faster than the NSAutoreleasePool objects, but only because you're avoiding the Objective-C message sends.