|
|
|
|
|
|
by Layke1123
1961 days ago
|
|
|
Your definition is wrong. It is not what people think making choices are. People feel they are free to make choices. That doesn't mean they actually had a choice if you permit that you are not on control of your brain processes even if you consider that "you". Your subjective experience of those processes is what people associate with choice, not an observation of some part "you" making the decisions that you are unaware of. You indeed are just a chest in the machine according to your owns words just now in these scenarios. It's intellectually dishonest to just redefine making choices however you want. It's a non- starter. Further more, you claim any your reasoning doesn't fail, and yet you also admit your viewpoint is vulnerable? It is an admission outright that your arguments don't withstand rational scrutiny. However, you have yet to articulate a an argument that does make my position vulnerable to scrutiny. |
|
|
I have responded to this elsewhere. We disagree, and continuing to argue about it is pointless.
> you claim any your reasoning doesn't fail, and yet you also admit your viewpoint is vulnerable?
I say that any viewpoint is vulnerable, so saying a viewpoint "fails" because it is vulnerable is pointless. Your viewpoint is vulnerable too.
> you have yet to articulate a an argument that does make my position vulnerable to scrutiny.
This is laughable. I have done so multiple times. You have not accepted my arguments, but that doesn't mean I haven't made any.
I think our discussion has run its course.