[frostming]

Thanks for giving a look and leaving so many reactions. This project was originally built to experiment on some new PEPs on Python packaging and it turned out working well.

1. What does PEP 582 differ from virtualenv, it is just another "virutualenv" The biggest difference, as you can see, is __pypackages__ doesn't carry an interpreter with it. This way the packages remain available even the base interpreter gets removed. 2. I prefer Poetry/virtualenvwrapper/Pipenv It is fine. If you feel comfortable with the current solution you are using, stick with it. I am not persuading that PDM is a better tool than those. Any of the said tools does a great job solving its own problems. PDM, IMO, does good in following aspects:

- Plugin system, people can enhance the functionalities easily with plugins - Windows support, PDM has completion support for PowerShell out of the box. Other CLI features also work as good as *nix on Windows.

[lr1970]

How does PDM deals with binary python modules like foo.so that in turn depend on other binary libraries like mylib.so? This is what conda manager and conda environments are great for, covering the ground for all major platforms.