|
|
|
|
|
|
by striking
1958 days ago
|
|
|
It can't be atomic if it's done `CONCURRENTLY`. You can't even do that in a transaction, Postgres will tell you it won't work. By using `CONCURRENTLY`, you're making it clear that you will handle atomicity yourself, and as a result Postgres needs to provide you with the tools to do it. Want real atomicity? Don't use `CONCURRENTLY`. |
|
|