|
|
|
|
|
by bargl
1961 days ago
|
|
I believe he's already met the burden of proof, there have been multiple minor studies that are peer reviewed and show a lot of promise. At this point, there is a reason to believe he's correct. In the state of emergency we are in that's enough to throw a few million dollars at research to clear this up. Also, the NIH has upgraded their recommendation from "Don't use ivermectin outside of clinical trials" to "there's insufficient data." which I translate to, we now need to peer review this. https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/antiviral-the... EDIT: I may have gone too soft on the way that I say things w/r to scientific studies. They are never settled until. They can and should always be considered disprovable. The fact that I believe Dr. Kory has enough evidence to clearly suggest we need to dig deeper into ivermectin quickly, doesn't mean I believe that research will prove him right or wrong.
I do however believe it is completely worth the money it would take to potentially save lives if ivermectin does prevent COVID. |
|