| > GNOME doesn't work for you. GNOME uses Wayland, but the bugs you experienced are not the fault of Wayland. They're the fault of GNOME. Yes, but I, and I believe most people talking about Wayland mean "user experience on current Wayland implementations", of course. > None of that has any bearing on Wayland No, Wayland is not a project that can stand for itself. It drives, needs and causes further work and implementation in compositors, Window libraries, applications, distributions, etc. Wayland on it's own is a academic coriosity. Wayland that "works" for anyone is a interplay between diverse forms of software implemting or relying on parts of it. Getting Wayland to work is were the problems are, not in the protocol (at least I assume so, I don't have any real insight into it). And that "Wayland stack" is not (completely) working for me. Then again I don't post on the Wayland bug tracker, but on the gnome one and I don't want to make excuses for > spiteful people who choose to use the botched GNOME roll-out to harass anyone who has anything to do with Wayland Harrasment has no place in in this discussion, no matter what one thinks of Wayland. ... But op was not really about that (at least I didn't understand it like that). It was about "wayland not working" being lies and people not getting it being either malicious or so fooled they are living in a fantasy. |