|
|
|
|
|
|
by cabaalis
1965 days ago
|
|
|
It requires respecting nature as a new class of asset. I think anyone might understand who has had the beautiful field next to their home developed into a neighborhood, or watched the woods behind their house torn down and developed. Had that beautiful field or wooded area been given a "nature cost" to destroy, maybe the developers would have made other choices. |
|
|