| Jan-Philip from Opstrace here. This is lovely feedback! > is a royal pain in the neck. It's fun to see how different people put the same unpleasant experience into words in this thread. Thanks for adding your personal touch. Every time we hear something like that, we're re-assured that we're on the right track. > Even if `opstrace create` spawns them easily, the problem is running/maintaining them Yes. You're right. While we can be proud of our setup/installation process already, we know that there's so much more to it. We don't underestimate that. Maybe also see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25998587, where I just commented on the robustness topic. > However, we are happy for you to be a custodian of that data. Great. > We want storage to be someone else's problem. I share that perspective. We, of course, are happy to let S3/GCS do the actual job. > We're happy for you to use a cloud platform like AWS/GCP and charge us a 50% markup. That's great to hear, and I hope you can be enthusiastic about the fact that our markup is _not_ going to be relative to storage volume. It's going to be independent of that. > Transparency, predictability of costs, open source --> all excellent. Thanks for sharing. That's incredibly motivating. Keep an eye on us, and we'd love to hear from you! |