Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by c1b 1965 days ago
This is not entirely accurate. It is the same position as borrowing some amount of money to buy the stock. If I buy a put and call and the price at expiry is exactly that strike I am guaranteed to lose money.
2 comments

Agreed. One of the reasons is that the option has a risk and therefore there's a cost associated with managing that risk and taking on the trade.
Not quite. It's the 'risk-free bond' term that I dropped from my explanation of the put call parity.

To replicate the stock, you'd buy the call and sell the put. The risk exactly balances out in the sense that a total portfolio of 1 stock short, 1 call long and 1 put short would have zero risk and behave like a risk-free bond.

(If the risk premia of the long call and the short put would not exactly balance, you could make money with very simple arbitrage trades.)

Yes, my explanation dropped the bond term from the put call parity.