|
|
|
|
|
by ethbr0
1966 days ago
|
|
The disincentive that tech consulting has is that jobs (at least in my area) were usually bid at fixed price. I have no idea if that's the way larger firms do it (would expect not). Consequently, profit = contract price - consultant hours. Every bad happened from minimizing the latter. Even if you do straight up billable hours with the client, your time was typically scheduled 1-2 projects in advance. This lead to being prematurely (in terms of things being "done") rolled off a project, onto a new one, and finishing / supporting the first from your hotel after-hours. This was in a pretty cowboy area. I imagine different parts of technical consulting behave differently. But yes, MVP quality code seems to be a constant. I saw that delivered from a top-tier technical consulting firm (ML solution) to a T100 customer. |
|