|
|
|
|
|
by vinniejames
1960 days ago
|
|
If only a public shared ledger was available for these institutions to settle trades on. People love knocking Bitcoin here, but this is why the technology exists. No reason to continue letting these institutions run smoke-and-mirrors with everyone's money |
|
You might also not want to have a public ledger of all the ownership interests.
It also doesn't exactly solve the problem. You still have the prospect of double spend, etc, until commitment/ledger settlement. And for high stakes transaction you probably want humans in the loop talking about what to do when these things happen instead of some automated policy.