|
|
|
|
|
by gmethowaway
1969 days ago
|
|
Honestly I'm not getting it. I understand the case when someone initiated the cash deposit and money are not settled yet, and there is a risk for broker that they will never settle on broker's bank account. But if we are talking about buying GME stock in non-margin account with settled money, what's the risk there?
If people bought stock on 400$ with settled cash, this cash is already on broker's account, so if it worth 20$ on Wednesday and poeple won't show up, what's the problem here?
Brokers even blocked buying GME stock on non margin accounts with settled cash.
edit: typos |
|
Anyway, 2 points:
1. This is not about margin accounts. When trading on margin, it's RH that's financing you and taking on the risk. That's separate from what the clearing house does. Incidentally, RH did increase margin requirements due to the higher volatility.
2. The problem is RH offers instant settlement. That is, you can use your proceeds from a trade immediately in the apo, before even the trade is settled. That exposes RH, and the clearing house to settlement failures, and that's true regardless if the trade was done on a margin account or not. And that's the risk that clearing houses try to mitigate via asking for collateral.