[chris_wot]

They still have to follow section 230 of the CDA, right? They will need to remove material that is "obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected".

There is a component to this where they have to have "good faith", but eventually this will go to court.

[kemitchell]

I'd encourage you to read the CDA again. I suspect some things you think Section 230 requires are actually things Section 230 merely supports companies in doing. See Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reno_v._American_Civil_Liberti...

[chris_wot]

Damn. I just reread the section. You are entirely correct.