|
|
|
|
|
|
by _ea1k
1971 days ago
|
|
|
I worry about this with the trend of using more laminated glass that is really difficult to break. But this Model S is very unlikely to have had that, and it sounds like there was a policeman on the scene. Surely the officer would have access to something that he could have used to break the glass? I've read a few articles about this lawsuit and I have yet to see a clear answer as to why that wasn't the solution. It makes me wonder if the "doors wouldn't open" part is just a spurious claim and the lawsuit is really about the post-crash fire. |
|
|