Well, the IRS doesn't go after rich people because they don't have the funding[1]; they only go after the people they can afford to go after[2].
I know the IRS is different from the SEC, Apples to Oranges. But like you said, they've neglected insider trading; it's probably for very similar reasons, because those being investigated just have too much power to take down. I'm sure the SEC will hammer these easy targets on WSB well before they even dare touch the Big Boys.
You are correct that they cherry picked information. However you are still incorrect on the original assertion that SEC is not in fact neutered. There have been more enforcement actions but insider trading enforcement has been the lowest in decades:
Could you note any major cases the previous administration pursued that didn't involve some lone scapegoat trader and/or a minority everyone could agree to dislike? Were there any actual cases after the 2008 mortgage/cdo/cds crisis, for example?
I don't know why you're being voted down here. These are legitimate articles in major publications that are broadly accepted by experts in the field. Sad!
There are many [1].
[1] https://secsearch.sec.gov/search/docs?utf8=%E2%9C%93&affilia...