|
|
|
|
|
by asheldon
1965 days ago
|
|
I agree. It would be simpler to shuffle the list of people, then split the list in half. Here's a proof this algorithm doesn't work by counter-example (N=6) Consider a list of 6 elements. Elements 5 and 6 must be in the same bucket 50% of the time and different buckets 50% of the time. For this to be true, after we place the first 4 elements into their buckets according to this algorithm, there must be space left in both buckets 50% of the time and in only one bucket 50% of the time. Sequences of the first 4 coin flips where neither bucket is filled, followed by possible ending sequences, and the odds of the prefix. AABB(AB, BA) = 1/16th ABAB(AB, BA) = 1/16th ABBA(AB, BA) = 1/16th BBAA(AB, BA) = 1/16th BABA(AB, BA) = 1/16th BAAB(AB, BA) = 1/16th Total: 3/8ths Sequences of the first 3-4 coin flips where one bucket is filled, followed by possible ending sequences, and the odds of the prefix: AAA(BBB) = 1/8th BBB(AAA) = 1/8th AABA(BB) = 1/16th ABAA(AA) = 1/16th ABBB(AA) = 1/16th BBAB(AA) = 1/16th BABB(AA) = 1/16th BAAA(BB) = 1/16th Total: 5/8ths Since one bucket is filled 5/8ths of the time after 4 elements are processed according to this algorithm, the final two elements will be in the same bucket 5/8ths of the time, not the expected 4/8ths of the time. |
|